Sanity Central

WHAT’S WITH THIS ELECTORATE?

April 23, 2008 · 3 Comments

 

I remember thinking, ‘now we’re in for it!’, when George W. Bush got reelected in 2004, over the erudite Senator John Kerry from Massachusetts, and now, after Senator Obama’s thumping in the Pennsylvania Primary last night, I’m experiencing the worst kind of deja vu: Haven’t I had this nightmare before?

Why is it that people scream, “Change, we want change,” and then when they are presented with candidates, opportunities for endemic change, change that goes to the heart of our problems, they get cold feet? Are these the same people that, “cling to their guns and religion”, when times get rough? The same people that  are afraid to leave their houses without a firearm strapped to their belts, the so-called Christians,  so afraid of their neighbors and in fact their own true natures that they have to go to mass every Sunday to ward off  their urge to be the real bastards they are– and that they would be, if they didn’t drown their worse natures in holy water? 

Nobody has much trouble understanding the crooked cop or the big city police department crippled by corruption. We’ve seen all the movies, “Serpico”, and “Prince of the City”, all the mob movies that tell us, “You can’t fight city hall” or “buck the system”, that make it painfully clear that the golden rule, “He who has the gold makes the rules”,  still holds sway. So why can’t we apply the same logic to our elected representatives in Washington, D.C.? Is it that we don’t see it on a daily basis in the flesh? Is it that we don’t want to assign the same mere-mortal fallibility to our esteemed congressmen, senators and even presidents, men and women that went to ivy-league law schools, that told us they would fight for us, for our best interests once in office? Do we not want to believe such things of the “best” of us, because then what would that say about us, about what our political system has devolved into?

If there was ever a time for change, if there ever was a time of opportunity for an unconventional presidential candidate to have a chance, isn’t this it? Isn’t it? We had a few candidates of change in the field at the start of this campaign season. On the Republican side we had Rep. Ron Paul, whose supporters proudly and rightfully put forth his uncompromising voting record as proof of his integrity and capability to lead this country. On the other side of the aisle we had people like Kucinich and Gravel, who spoke truth about the, “broken system” in D.C. Even a Washington insider like Joe Biden shook his weary head and conceded that unless we went about the business of fixing the system nothing was likely to change. And John Edwards, who came out fighting like the bulldog we need, most consistently had the special interest problem in his cross hairs. But let’s face it, where are all these people now? The only one left is Barack Obama, and that’s why I support him.

Nobody, at least, nobody with any sense, thinks Barack Obama walks on water. Yeah, he’s a good speaker, yeah he’s got a charisma, but those qualities only give him an edge when it comes to presentation; if you’re listening to what he’s saying you know that he consistently brings the discussion back to the lobbying in D.C that, put simply, amounts to bribery, and that in turn puts the interests of the American people on hold for yet another day. It keeps our medicine damn near cost-prohibitive, our health insurance inadequate, and the manufacturers of firearms operating with impunity, our price of gasoline at record highs one day after another, which gets us into wars like the one in Iraq, that has claimed the lives of over 4,000 of our young men and women and seriously injured over 30,000 more, and that by many estimations, has taken the lives of hundreds of thousands of Iraqi civilians and displaced over 1,000,000 more, largely consisting of that country’s destroyed middle class. A country that by Western standards would have been considered one of the best in the Arab world before our first attack and before the relentless, U.S. imposed embargos that followed for the next ten-plus years,  one of the most advanced of the Arab countries, blasted and starved and denied medicines and technology into the Dark Ages.  

America is for sale, and you can’t afford it, and nothing will change until we hang a “Closed For Business” sign on the steps of the Capitol and start doing a better job of looking out for the needs of the American people, just because we can; like the one honest cop in a corrupt precinct who doesn’t take money just for the hell of it, just out of some old fashioned idea about right and wrong and fairness. Sound a little corny, a little too Kumbayah? Fine Pennsylvania, my home state, you can afford to see it that way. You can afford to stay home on the most important voting day you’ve had since November 2004. Only half of the eligible voters of that state are registered, and only half of them bothered to show up at the polls yesterday. Only one-fourth of you who could vote yesterday, did. But it’s not fair of me to single out Pennsylvania since those percentages are pretty standard across the country.

But the next time that one of you wants to complain about gas prices or prescription prices or the fact that your job has been phased-out or shipped overseas, those of us who vote in every election without fail, despite the fact that it will most certainly mean a bout with jury duty, won’t want to hear it. And those of you who did cast your vote, but did it because of race or gender, listen up! You’re holding us back! The weight of your ignorance and prejudice and fear is a burden the rest of this country can no longer afford to bear.

Categories: Uncategorized

3 responses so far ↓

  • joey33 // April 23, 2008 at 2:49 pm

    What’s up Dad! I really enjoyed reading this post. You’ve really put yourself, your ideas and opinions on the line. I WANT to read a blog that is one sided, as long as it is clear which side the author is on. Flip-flopping is for dirty politicians.

    So we agree that there is a problem with our country. People don’t vote, people don’t care, people are uninformed. I think you hit it on the head last time when you said that there is no excuse for ignorance nowadays. The information is literally at our fingertips.

    Where we might have a difference is that I don’t think that the buck stops at these congressmen and senators. I think that the real bosses are the ones behind the scenes controlling our money supply, controlling the banks; the senators are merely hired hands.

    This quote from Mayer Amschel ROTHSCHILD sums it up for me:

    “Give me control of a nation’s money supply, and I care not who makes its laws.”

    More on Mayer Amschel Rothchild here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mayer_Amschel_Rothschild

    So I guess we’re saying the same thing regarding the “golden rule”. I just don’t think these senators and congressmen are the ones in control of the gold although they are a major part of the problem. The larger part of the problem is that government is not in control of the money supply. Our Consititution clearly states that it should. Again…the marriage of business and government is evil.

    Ron Paul proposed that we get rid of the federal reserve. I think that would get to the root of the problem. Banning lobbyists is a good idea too.

    It takes a man of great integrity and courage to step up and propose that we get rid of the federal resrve bank. If Barack Obama would even mention anything closely related, he would have my attention. Since he doesn’t it leads me to believe that he either doesn’t know or understand the problem with the Fed, or he does but doesn’t want to change it.

    Back to the people, the voters, the citizens. Now that you have the information to make good decisions, do your research, stay informed, inform others and take action. Voting is not enough.

    Here’s a post about the federal reserve that I found on Barack Obama’s website: http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/jamesjackson/gGBcYd

    If Barack would only listen to this advice, he might have my vote. I really believe that he completely understands the problem with the federal reserve but sides with the bankers instead of with the people like you and I.

  • sobrdup // April 23, 2008 at 5:08 pm

    I wrote a detailed response, but it was lost due to no email provided! However, the summary of it is that you sound just like a Ron Paul supporter, because you can think for yourself, and care. You are right that the leading candidates will not really change things, because the problems go much deeper. None of them will fundamentally change the power and spending government currently is set up for. Not even Obama. Only Ron Paul addresses the root problems we have. I won’t go into detail about what those are, but any American should know that fundamentally offensive war such as we currently support is morally wrong (not to mention financial costs). Yet, neither Obama or Clinton have given a clear indication of ending the war, just political rhetoric about “timelines” which means another 5-10 years if necessary. Ron Paul has always said the word “immediately” in regards to bringing troops home, and that Korea and other places globally. How long have we been in Korea? Why? Both Obama and Clinton are also prepared to start war with Iran. Most Americans will not understand why the need for all this war, or who actually controls things, or what is the military-industrial complex. They will vote based on other things, and that’s how we continue to get what we have always got. Please investigate more into our actual problems, and then you will realize that Dr. Ron Paul is the only one that can fit the tall order of fundamental government change we need. Join the Ron Paul rEVOLution! More info at http://www.dailypaul.com.

  • Marnie // April 28, 2008 at 10:07 pm

    Americans seem to be easily swayed by the media’s bias, and it’s a shame… this election is so vital to our country, but the important issues are becoming clouded by talk of retired 60s anarchists, bitter citizens, and flag lapel pins (or the lack thereof).

    And now that Jeremiah Wright is coming out and speaking about this to CNN and the like, and getting his 5 minutes of fame, it looks like he is going to become an issue again. Why? Because the media says so. It’s really quite disgusting.

    I think political mudslinging is an ugly, old trend, and I love Obama for saying that he denounces it. Clinton uses and abuses it shamelessly, and that’s what makes her so distasteful to me at the moment, that her politics come before her morals– that they are even two separate issues at all.

Leave a Comment