Watching ABC’s Pennsylvania debate last night I had the feeling that I had either unmindfully drifted into that hazy territory of the chronically conspiracy obsessed, or I was witnessing something that I had never seen so clearly before, live and in-living-color: the grinding gears of the unholy marriage of big business and big politics, coming together in an ugly display of their self-interest, bullying Sen. Obama, as well as every voter in Pennsylvania and in effect in the country in a desperate attempt to Hail-Mary the rock down field into scoring territory.
Charlie Gibson set the ground rules up front, such as they were to be, flexible but not permissive. Really Charlie? Not once did you ring the bell on Clinton, who if I didn’t know better, or want to believe better of our political process, seemed to take each question as her cue. You could almost see the handwritten Cliff notes running through her head, as she launched into one speech after another on the essay question at hand- the latest raps on Obama’s questionable associations, or the re-wringing of his most recent misstatement for the hundred and fiftieth time for the first forty-five minutes of the two hour time slot. An embarrassingly grueling time, after which I took a breath, I steadied myself, and I resolved to start anew, to give my country, my country’s trustworthy mainstream media, a chance to redeem itself, the benefit of the doubt for the good of us all. But of course we only got more of the same, and straight through the few substantive questions, into the staged recap by a “journalist” standing by in one of Philly’s historic, and for some of us at least democratically symbolic cites. In a suspiciously curt way ABC’s man-on-the-scene then rattled off Clinton’s various takings of Obama to task, on such vital issues as Rev. Wright and the infamous beaten-to-death “bitter” remark in a tough but kind as she could be manner. So transparent, even Charlie Gibson had to laugh in embarrassment, a reaction wreaking of, ‘Hey! Couldn’t you have played it up a little? Don’t you know that we’re supposed to appear impartial in this thing?’
PLEASE. DO YOU THINK THAT WE ARE ALL STUPID, OR JUST ENOUGH OF US SO THAT YOU WILL BE ABLE TO GET AWAY WITH IT?
And George Stephanopoulos as moderator? Hmm … Wasn’t he Bill Clinton’s press secretary? And a Disney owned ABC with its CEO Robert Iger, isn’t he a big Hillary Clinton supporter, a big campaign contributor? Makes you stop and think, doesn’t it? It should, but don’t be too hard on yourself if you can’t connect all the dots. You’re not supposed to see behind the curtain. It’s hard enough to figure out what these people are up to on our behalf when we have all the facts. But as Bob Dylan put it in a time long ago but so very discouragingly similar to the one we live in now, “Look out kid they keep it all hid.”
And the most discouraging thing about last night was that it was just the tip of the iceberg, a symptom of a systemic, insidious, lethal, hope-breaking, apathy-inducing problem that in my opinion, is the issue of our time. The one that we will have to tackle if we are to see improvements in our lives or in the lives of our children, our grandchildren, great granchildren … etc., and that is the power that big business concerns wield over our politicians, the ones we elected into office, the ones supposed to act on our behalf, who are supposed to have our best interests in mind, not Disney’s. The ones that even in our time of disbelief, can bring lumps to our throats and water to our eyes, the ones we entrust with our futures and the futures of our descendants, the ones that we put our faith in to deliver us from a life of random shootings– school shootings no less, in our high schools, universities, and now even in our middle and elementary schools– of a monopolized pharmaceutical industry that charges us much more than we can afford to pay, of health insurance costs that are out of reach to many and at best provide a net to catch us one moment before we hit the ground, right before our bodies splatter into untreatable, of a war that has been the most privatized of all wars, a war that when it all comes out years from now, I believe, will prove itself to be just what many of us suspected all along, a bonanza of a business opportunity waged only with those special interests in mind. And when millions of dollars are gained or lost on Wall Street with the minuscule movement of a stock in one direction or the other, can we really wonder why those that can, do not hesitate to manipulate it? Wake up America, Americans, the country I love, the people I love, we are being duped, taken, scammed, hoodwinked. Doesn’t it make you angry? Doesn’t it make you sad? Isn’t your heart broken for the country that we used to claim with such pride that has since sold us out?
Truth is, until recently, I didn’t have anything against Hillary Clinton. In fact, coming into this campaign season I was more likely to vote for the Senator from New York than anybody. This is not an election for the unelectable. This, like 2004, is not a time to vote for a candidate that cannot win; and this comes from a guy who has voted for Ross Perot, Ralph Nader, and who also voted for Ronald Reagan and George Bush The Elder, and who has still not quite gotten over the fact that even though “W” early in ‘04 seemed to be, either due to an oblivious brain or a sinister heart, leading us into disaster, still managed to persuade 52% of the American voters that he was the better man for the job.
I enjoyed the refreshing illuminations of the few honest candidates on both sides this time around; but in candor, I have to say that Ron Paul was the only Republican that I would have considered in November. But I liked Kucinich and even Gravel for his upturning of the poker table, and Senator Joe Biden, as the old time workhorse too tried and tired to lie about much at this late stage of his game. And if Hillary, Bill’s tried and jaded comrade in the rough game of big time political survival gets the Democratic nomination, I like most of us on the blue side of the political template will vote for her; but it will be reluctantly, with a heavy heart and braving an irritating hitch in my git-along, because I believe that with a vote in that direction, in either direction if Obama is out of the picture, will be a vote for “big business” as usual.
I heard a number recently a couple of times that some of you may not have heard, a statistic that brings some perspective: In the late sixties, forty years ago, there were under 3,000 lobbyists, special interest liaisons running around D.C. Now … are you ready? There are ten times that many, somewhere around 30,000 of these characters operating in the capital. Guys that are paid money, lots of it, to influence the Congress and the Senate, to either champion their bills, bills that in most cases are pre-written for the politicians, or to vote pro or against bills that will either greatly hinder or aid their industry. Their interests, not yours and not mine, but theirs. Such as whether the sick can buy medications they need to stay alive from Canada at a reasonable rate or not. Which in many cases, means that they have or have to go without; which, in some cases- we have no way of knowing how many, means they live or die. In America? Really? This is how we live? This is how we treat our elderly, our parents and grandparents, our neighbors from the old neighborhood that never complained about throwing our balls back onto our side of the fence, and now and then even gave us a tip or two to improve our batting or pitching, or threw in an extra handful of penny candy from time to time on the house at the five and dime store just because they could and it made them and us feel good for a while. It affirmed something to us about us. Something that made us feel better about who we were, about who we all were and what America was; was of course being the operative word.
In generalities it’s simple. The grasping of it in any depth is always more complex or at least more involved. Suffice it to say that it costs around one hundred million dollars to run for president today, and who of us, other that the extremely rich or extremely corrupt can afford to run? Who, except for the few candidates, two that I can name off the top of my head, Barack Obama and Ron Paul that refuse to take special interest money, and who finance their campaigns strictly from grass-root donations, can take office in early 2009 beholden to nobody? Can wake-up on day one, look at themselves in the mirror and say, “I owe no favors and no special considerations to anyone, other than to the greatest number of Americans?”
If a bill comes across the desk to President X, a president that long ago sold him or her self out, right along with all of those high ideals and blurred good intentions of his well-intentioned youth, a bill that if he goes one way will benefit a major corporation/contributor, and if he goes the other will bring some relief, some correction to our freefalling quality of life, just an inch of an improvement that will enable us to carry with us a little more hope in our day to day lives, that will allow us to look into the eyes of our children and tell them without lying that it will be ok, that their lives will be better than ours. That this country, our country, their country, not Halliburton’s or Blackwater’s, not the United States of Fox or of Disney or of Bear-Stearns or Countrywide or any other non-living and breathing entity, tell me which way do you think President X will go? Consistently go? And where do you think that will leave us? Wake up Americans! Ignorance is no longer a defensible defense. Either that or you won’t be able to complain about it when things that matter to you, anything that matters to you, but lies in direct conflict with the interests that have so much more juice than you do in D.C. that you are invisible and your best interests aren’t even a genuine consideration.
Barack Obama presents us with an opportunity for a change, a change in the way business is conducted in Washington, D.C., and a challenge to be the best that we can be as a nation. Are we up to that challenge? Are we ready for a change that will restore us, we Americans, to the greatness which we once took as a given? America … it’s the greatest country in the world … Remember?
5 responses so far ↓
Marnie // April 17, 2008 at 2:59 pm
I couldn’t agree more.
America is in a sorry state, and the debate last night was pure unadulterated proof of it. Nothing gets done in this country anymore because of special interests getting in the way, and Obama seems to be our only way of finally escaping the “politics as usual” hell that is this administration and what seems to be Hillary Clinton’s, and apparently ABC News’, M.O.
It’s also sad to see an experienced man like Charlie Gibson lower himself last night. He should know better. Gibson was exceedingly obnoxious and interrupted Senator Obama several times, apparently imploring him to get to the point but butting in every time he tried to do just that. I’m exasperated with the state of affairs in this country, that the American President will do nothing to help Americans, and that the media is no better.
And how about Stephanopoulos using a question from Sean Hannity? I thought that there might be a shred of integrity left in the whole situation, but apparently I was wrong.
But good on you for speaking what everyone else was thinking.
Laura Hatton // April 17, 2008 at 7:11 pm
Welcome to the land of the free and the home of the brave gone totally wrong. If you think Obama is the answer, then think again. Look at his voting record and see if he can be trusted.
You mentioned Ron Paul. He was treated much worse by the MSM than Obama ever has and you know why? Because the powers that be are absolutely terrified of him because not one single person owns him. That’s the man I want to be president.
John // April 17, 2008 at 8:23 pm
I believe that things are going to get much worse before we begin the long and arduous process of making them better. Too many people could simply care less about all this and really anything political.
As for Obama, Hillary and McCain – they are each going to quicken the pace of America’s looming bankruptcy in different ways. McCain will do it through more war spending, Hillary via nationalized health care and Obama wants to take nearly another 1 trillion out of our pockets each year to send to people in other countries.
It seems you like Obama, I don’t mean to put down your candidate but for the longest time Obama did not give clear answers really about anything. When asked direct questions that he could not sidestep he would often simply reply that he needs to get in the White House first before he can really implement change. “Change,” “change,” “change” is all I ever really hear from the guy and very rarely ever anything of substance.
What we really need is integrity in the White House. Someone who we can trust to hold true to their word. Someone who also has a rock solid track record to back it up. Someone who we know will follow the laws of our land, beginning at the core of our laws: The Constitution. Yes, you probably already guessed it – for me that someone is Ron Paul as none of the other presidential candidates even come close.
Regarding the mainstream media working against Obama… I’m actually glad because maybe that will wake more people up to this problem. They did the same exact thing to Ron Paul, but 10x worse.
joey33 // April 17, 2008 at 8:45 pm
It is no surprise that the mainstream media has the power to sway an election and uses that power regularly. Ron Paul, Dennis Kucinich and Mike Gravel got the worst of it in this election. If you were disgusted with this debate, image how I felt as a Ron Paul supporter watching every single one of his debates. The mainstream actually gives Obama a lot of attention. He’s received plenty of coverage from the beginning.
When you talk about your experiences with people within the community being generous, it reminds me of why the idea of America is so awesome. The idea based on personal freedom and liberty. I agree that part of the problem with America is the collusion between big business and government, that should not be. I don’t think that “big business” by itself is as harmful as “big government”. Put the two together and you get pure evil.
Government’s job is to protect individual liberties. It’s job is not meant to protect any particular group of people whether it be the rich, the poor, black, white, big business or small business. The purpose of government is to protect individual rights. When the individual has freedom, they have power. A group of powerful individuals can influence a community. A community can influence a city, a state and so on. I don’t think we need government to help us out as a group, but instead stay out of our ways as individuals. Give us the freedom to think and do, and let us keep what we’ve created in terms of our money.
I think the problem centers around the federal banking system and their ability to determine the value of the dollar. When the value of the dollar goes down, where can the government get the money to fund their “projects”? They either tax us outright or they impose the hidden tax, inflation. When the Federal Reserve prints money and devalues the money in my pocket, they are stealing from me. The power and freedom that I’ve earned has been taken from me. My ability to influence “big business” has been reduced. And my ability and willingness to help out my fellow man by offering them my time and money, the fruits of my labor, are close to nothing. That doesn’t mean that I don’t want to, but rather that I can’t. When someone steals from me, I am not in the most giving mood.
Big business is not the problem. Big businesses are efficient and can offer products and services at a lower cost. Because they can do this, people offer to give up their hard earned cash because of the value the businesses offer. Even a company like Microsoft offers products that individuals are willing to purchase because of their perceived value. Microsoft even turns a blind eye to the fact that many people are pirating their software. Google gives more free services and products than any company I can think of. In a free market, big businesses only survive because the offer value. Once people stop supporting the business financially, the business goes down.
Enter government. The government that gave you FEMA. No matter how badly the government performs, they still get your hard earned money. It doesn’t matter if people agree with the policies, if they support what is being done, it doesn’t matter. If you don’t agree then you maybe sent to prison, be harassed, be killed, or be sent out to be killed in a war. But…at least you voted right? Ha.
Rarely does an individual come along that can move masses, move masses to become leaders and not followers. Individuals don’t have the power to fight back by themselves, but as an organized group, can change the world. Yes we can. We need someone to guide us. Someone to lead us. Wait a second, do we really? Can’t we guide ourselves? We need an organizer, yes, but not someone to provide the vision for us. We just need someone who will protect our ability to lead ourselves and to live out our dreams and visions for the future.
A lot of people seem to like Barack because of his leadership qualities and his charisma. How about the fact that he is not against going to war with Iran? If our economic problems are due to a useless war in Iraq, then what makes it so different if we go to war with Iran? He wants to help groups of individuals, specifically the poor and middle class. Really? Really? With what money? Oh yeah, our money. My money. I am forced to help out because Barack says so. Can’t I decide to be good on my own? I guess not, because I will have to if Barack or Hillary gets elected. If these social programs are so good, then why are people forced to pay for them? Any public service such as public roads and fire departments would easily survive without government intervention. Who wouldn’t pay for roads to be maintained? Maybe the guy who doesn’t drive. Well he shouldn’t have to pay anyway. If I don’t need any of these social services, I shouldn’t have to pay either.
Barack seems to attract those who are more interested in his personality and his catchy phrases than they are about his policy. Ask most Barack Obama supporters what they like about him with regards to policy and many of them will not have an answer. What a shame. It’s another case of the blind leading the blind.
What we need is smaller government, not larger government. It’s not about Democrats or Republicans, it’s about voting records; what they’ve done in the past that will be a good predictor of what they will do, not what they claim to stand for. I despise when people get into democrat and republican. Many democrats act like republicans and vice versa. Does any educated person really believe that John, 100 years of war, McCain stands for republican values? Republicans were elected to end wars, not perpetuate them.
Politics is difficult to discuss because people will almost always agree with policies that benefit them the most. If the government decides to spend tax dollars on the education system, the teachers are happy and the people who did not receive the funding are angry. You can’t make everyone happy, but you can be fair. Many times the best and most fair decision is not to decide one way or another for a any group, but instead to allow individuals to decide for themselves. If I wasn’t taxed so heavily I would give more to the homeless. When I’m taxed, I figure my money is already been pre-allocated by the government and so I have done my duty. The problem is that people are not informed enough to make good decisions for themselves. Now with the Internet, there is no excuse that things are hidden. Nothing is hidden. Maybe it is hidden from TV viewers, but not here on the web. But you’re right, there is no excuse for ignorance. If you want to see how ridiculous the MSM (Mainstream Media) actually is, just go to ww.youtube.com and watch any of the Ron Paul interviews with Fox, CNN, ABC, NBC. Their bias is much easier to detect when you see it out of context.
Your blog was well writen Dad. I’m glad that you’re using it.
Peggy // April 17, 2008 at 9:50 pm
Nice Blog…
Thank you for the kind words in reference to Congressman Dr.Ron Paul the only statesman that will get my support and my vote and I list the reasons why.
Brief Overview of Congressman Paul’s Record:
He has never voted to raise taxes.
He has never voted for an unbalanced budget.
He has never voted for a federal restriction on gun ownership.
He has never voted to raise congressional pay.
He has never taken a government-paid junket.
He has never voted to increase the power of the executive branch.
He voted against the Patriot Act.
He voted against regulating the Internet.
He voted against the Iraq war.
He does not participate in the lucrative congressional pension program.
He returns a portion of his annual congressional office budget to the U.S. treasury every year.
Congressman Paul introduces numerous pieces of substantive legislation each year, probably more than any single member of Congress.
Mainstream Media will not report on the facts we need to do our own research.
P.S. Obama voted for the Patriot Act